Fat Injection

Penile Enlargement » Fat Injection
Fat Injection 2018-05-07T12:35:25+00:00

Fat Injection

NOTE: The Male Enhancement Centers and Dr. Elist do not perform Fat Injection Penile Enlargement Procedures. The following material is solely for information purposes. Complications reported in this section are based on phalloplasty revision surgeries performed at our facility due to previous fat injection procedures and their associated complications.

”The American Urological Association (AUA) and the Urology Care Foundation consider subcutaneous fat injection for increasing penile girth to be a procedure which has not been shown to be safe or efficacious”


Fat Grafting

The concept of free fat transfer (FFT) has been around since the late 1800s when fat was first reported to be used to fill soft tissue defects.  The scope of fat transfer techniques has been continuously broadened to include tissue defect repairs in the face, breasts, and other areas of the body. Despite advancements in harvesting and transfer, the effects of free fat transfer have been shown to be rather limited. FFT is mostly effective when used to fill small soft tissue defects in the face and in areas with scarring.

Fat grafting procedures are mostly performed by qualified plastic surgeons. The procedure entails the harvesting of fat tissue, mostly from the abdominal area, and the transfer of the harvested fat into other parts of the body. Nearly 30% of the harvested fat cells survive the procedure. The transfer of harvested fat tissue is then performed using cannulas and needles.

Despite initial beliefs, fat tissue has been discovered to consist of fat cells with a thin membrane and a network of fibrous tissue providing its structural network. Fat tissue is also highly vascularized and its survival after transfer requires integration into the surrounding tissue for later revascularization.

Fat transfer procedures are generally very minimally invasive, cost efficient, and do not require the insertion of foreign material.

The success of a fat transfer procedure usually depends on:

  • The location where the harvested fat is transferred to
  • The amount of transferred fat
  • Patient’s healing properties
  • The surgeon’s expertise.

The ideal location for fat transfer is in areas of the body which naturally contained a fair amount of fat but has diminished over the years- transfer of fat to areas with no natural fat content is not recommended for many reasons.

Here is what the American Society of Plastic Surgeons says about fat transfer procedures:

January 2009- Fat Transfer/Fat Graft and Fat Injection ASPS Guiding Principles

“…Using fat transfer and fat injections is both safe and effective as a cosmetic and reconstructive procedure… This technique works well for breast and gluteal augmentation, repair of contour deformities, facial augmentation, hand rejuvenation and lip augmentation.”

The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery says the following regarding Fat Injection:

“Fat injection or grafting has broad applications in cosmetic surgery. Fat injected into areas requiring volume-enhancement produces safe, long-lasting, and natural-appearing results as volume is replaced to tissues where fat is diminished.”

While the use of free fat transfer (FFT) has become mainstream in plastic and reconstructive surgery, its use has so far only been approved for the correction of defects mainly in the face.


Fat Injection - AUAAmerican Urological Association (AUA)  does not Approve Fat Injection for Penile Enlargement:

The use of fat for penis augmentation has not yet been approved by the American Urology association:

”The American Urological Association (AUA) and the Urology Care Foundation consider subcutaneous fat injection for increasing penile girth to be a procedure which has not been shown to be safe or efficacious.”

Most urologists do not perform penile fat injection procedures.


How and How Much of the Transferred Fat Survives?

For the transferred fat tissue to survive, it requires a process called neovascularization where new blood vessels build and grow inside the fat tissue. Neovascularization is initiated by the surrounding fat and soft tissue. This process is accompanied by an inflammatory reaction which results in a replacement of the transferred fat cells with connective and fibrotic tissue.

This mechanism is one of the most important factors why fat transfer is not an appropriate technique for penile augmentation.

Fat tissue transfer has been recommended to areas where natural fat has previously existed so that newly transferred fat tissue can integrate into pre-existing fat and fill up the lost volume.  When transferred under the penile skin, where natural fat has never existed, the newly transferred fat tissue survives by integrating itself inside the soft tissue of the underlying shaft and the overlying skin. By doing so, it does not only take away nutrition from the skin, but it also leads to fibrosis, scarring, and possible skin necrosis.

In fact, when too much fat has been transferred into one location, the removal of the excess graft is very difficult due to tissue infiltration into the fat graft.

Simply said, fat tissue transfer should only be attempted in areas with some pre-existing natural fat. If transferred to an inappropriate location, adhesions, scarring, and soft tissue damage may occur.

The amount of surviving fat tissue has also been widely studied in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery:

Chajchir et:

  • 3 months after transfer: zones of cell necrosis, fat cells, and new vessel zones
  • 6-8 months after transfer: heavy inflammatory reaction and fibrosis
  • 12 months after transfer: large amount of connective tissue and fibrotic reaction. Some fat was still present.


  • Fat absorption range: 20-90%

Cortese et al:

  • Fat absorption range: 75-85%

When reading the above listed values, one needs to keep in mind that these are observations after using proper FFT techniques with transfer of fat to areas containing pre-existing fat.

The loss of fat grafts injected inside the penis is usually much more dramatic compared to the above numbers.


Fat-Grafting in the Penis

Penis fat grafts usually tend to be absorbed starting 3 months after initial injection. The loss can range from 30 to 100%, which is mostly associated with severe skin scarring and adhesions, as well as a “lumpy-bumpy” deformity.

The average survival rate of transferred fat tissue, as reported by physicians performing penile fat tissue procedures, is somewhere close to 30%. That means to say that, after several months, only 1/3 of the transferred fat remains.

Transferred fat being absorbed almost instantly requires touch ups every few months in order to maintain size and aesthetically acceptable proportion. When transferred again, the same risks and complications are expected to occur.


How does the Penis Look and Feel After Fat Injection?

While after the initial injection a noticeable amount of girth increase is observed, the look of the treated penis usually depends on the amount of transferred fat tissue, the survival rate, amount of fat cell necrosis, and the extent of fibrosis and scarring causing adhesions. The injected fat is located between the penile skin and the penile erectile tissue (corpora cavernosa), acting as a soft fat cushion. The feel to the touch of a fat injected penis is usually described as “marshmallow” like with a soft consistency, which does not change much upon erection.


Who Performs Fat Injection for Penile Augmentation Procedures?

As with any surgical procedure, a patient’s first step when considering surgical penile augmentation should be extensive research about available options, expected outcomes, and desired results. Medical specialties have been established in order to provide the patient with knowledge about the area of concern and secure the best possible outcomes.

When it comes to the male genital area, a urologist is certainly the most appropriate resource for information regarding safe penile surgery.

The American Urology Association has not approved fat transfer procedures for penile augmentation:

”The American Urological Association (AUA) and the Urology Care Foundation consider subcutaneous fat injection for increasing penile girth to be a procedure which has not been shown to be safe or efficacious”

In the US, most urologist do not perform fat injections for penile augmentation. Fat injections into the penis are mostly performed by plastic and aesthetic surgeons.

The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery says penile fat injection is experimental, with “insufficient data to establish its safety and effectiveness.


What Other Doctors Say About Fat Injection for Penile Enlargement

“Fat grafting is the most common, and the most notorious, of the penile augmentation procedures. It can result in disasters such as loss of the penis if fat is injected into blood vessels or if infection occurs. When the augmentation does work, the result is temporary. Complications such as nodules in the penis, skin deformity, and scarring and loss of normal contour are common. The injected fat is extremely fragile and needs to remain fairly motionless in order for blood vessels to grow into the tissue. If they don’t grow in three days, the fat will die and be absorbed by the body. If the fat is disturbed during the first three weeks, it will lose its new blood supply and be resorbed. The penis cannot stay motionless when urinating and when erections develop. Virtually, by definition, fat grafting into the penis is doomed to fail.”

“Most of the research has suggested that the fat injections will dissolve within six to eight months. Occasionally small areas of ‘fat encapsulation’ or hard fat nodules will occur which can give a lumpy texture to the penile shaft. There seems to be fairly good initial results, but the long-term results seem to be more inconsistent and unpredictable.”

Patients who desire to have augmentation must clearly understand that initially there will be a fullness and swelling of the areas of the transplanted tissue, and that multiple or additional procedures may be required to maintain the desired girth enhancement and to smooth out any irregularities.”

“Complications relating to autologous fat injections include disappearance of fat, penile lumps and nodules, and shaft deformities.”

“Many a penis has been injected with anything you can imagine including paraffin wax, silicone and others. Fat has repeatedly been tried. The problem with fat is that it does not always survive leaving irregular lumps and scars. When it does work, the penis takes on the texture of fat. How erotic is a wider, somewhat irregular penis with the consistency of a marshmallow?”


What are the Complications of Penile Fat Injections?

Complications with fat injections into the penis can be include the following:

  • Mild to severe absorption with severe deformity,
  • Skin adhesions,
  • Skin scarring
  • Necrosis associated with severe deformity, and severe infections.

In areas where fat injections have been proven to be safe and effective (e.g. the face), complications may include:

  • Placement of too much fat: failed revascularization and graft loss
  • Graft migration: deformities and graft loss
  • Graft absorption: loss of volume with deformity
  • Clumping of graft: nodules, lumps and deformities
  • Damage to the underlying structures: skin and soft tissue scarring and necrosis
  • Prolonged edema: swelling and watery consistency of injected area
  • Bleeding
  • Infections
  • Donor site scarring: contour irregularities on harvested site


Case Studies

Our office is frequently visited by men who have had previously undergone penile augmentation procedures done using free fat graft transfer. As a result, we often observe most of the above mentioned complications.

The following are examples of complications we have seen and treated at our facilities.

Case#: 1

27 years old African-American male with a history of fat injection into the penis performed 6 months ago. Current complaints included diminished injected fat with areas of skin thickening, resulting in an unacceptable appearance of the penis. The patient was very unhappy with the results and requested a removal of the residual fat and placement with the ELIST implant. While the damages upon physical examination seem to be rather limited to aesthetic deformity and some skin adhesions, the actual state of being of his penile skin and erectile bodies was discovered to be much more dramatic during surgery.

The residual fat graft was partially loose, and partly adherent to the skin, especially to the areas which had been noticed to be thickened before surgery. These areas of the skin presented with severe soft tissue adhesions due to fat tissue replacement by necrotic tissue. A partial removal of the necrotic skin was necessary in order to remove the fat graft. Two areas of the skin suffered severe damages which resulted in later skin necrosis and perforation requiring two additional revisional surgeries.

Due to severe skin damages by prior fat injection, it is not possible, nor will it ever be possible, to place the ELIST implant in this patient.

Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 1
Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 1

During a recent follow up visit, almost one year after the fat removal surgery, the skin condition can be described as almost recovered. Some areas of skin adhesion are still present at the location where skin perforation occurred.


Case#: 2

35 years old Caucasian male with history of penile fat injection procedure performed 1 year ago with a touch up done 6 months ago. The patient reported that the initial fat tissue injection did not last very long with obvious deficits and bumps after only 4 months post-surgery. Current complaints included diminished fat tissue with a mostly left sided fat lump close to the penile base containing an almost 1 inch large, hardened structure, and a completely diminished fat area in the frontal ½ of the penis. Patient requested a removal of the injected fat tissue and ELIST implant placement. During physical examination the penile skin was found to be very healthy looking, elastic, and with no areas of leathering. A fairly large, soft tissue lump was noticed on the left penile base area with a very hard “pint” like structure.

During removal surgery the injected fat graft was found to be completely loose and non-adhering to the skin with no obvious damages. The fat graft was removed in one piece and containing a “pint” like structure which proved to be severely calcified fat tissue. If left untreated, the fat tissue calcification was expected to progress and perforate the skin, especially upon erection and sexual activity.

The patient is yet to come back for a follow up appointment and possible placement of the ELIST implant.

Fat Injection
Fat Injection
Fat Injection


Other Cases with Previous Fat Injection and Following Penile Deformity:

Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 3
Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 3
Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 3
Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 4
Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 4
Fat Injection ComplicationsCase 4

We hope you have found this article to be informative and helpful. For more information regarding Fat Injection, Penile Enhancement or The ELIST Implant, please contact our friendly staff at 310-652-2600. We are happy to answer any questions you may have.


Feel Free to Contact Dr. Elist For More Information

Need more information? Need to know if you are eligible for penile enlargement surgery or not?

Need to consult with Dr. Elist? Or simply need to know how much it costs?

Just fill the form below and we will reach out to you in 24 hours!